- -
UserInfo

Welcome Anonymous




Membership:
Latest: Micks66
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 896

People Online:
Members: 2
Visitors: 2
Bots: 7
Total: 11
Who Is Where:
Members:
Dwayne ā‡Ø Forums
lukep6470 ā‡Ø Forums
Visitors:
01. Forums
02. News
 Bots:
01. Forums
02. Forums
03. Forums
04. Forums
05. Forums
06. Forums
07. Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
We have received
34244940
page views since
July 27, 2010

Hits New Today: 11013
Hits New Yesterday: 19024

Server Time
19 January 2018 14:46:52 AEDT (GMT +11)
Mustang Technical Discussion > Pre 1973 > Hane narrow springs > Community Forums > Mustang Forum Australia - Mustang Tech

View posts since last visit ā€¢ View posts last 24 hours ā€¢ View unanswered posts
Forum Index > Pre 1973

Hane narrow springs Reply to topic

Author Message
Dwayne
Senior Mustang

Offline
Joined: Jun 01, 2016
Posts: 230
Location: Radelaide

0 šŸ‘ / 0 šŸ‘Ž


Has anyone looked into the narrow springs by Hane?

Hane narrow springs

The 275's fit but only with about 1cm clearance on the standard springs:



View user's profile
ozbilt
Site Admin

Offline
Joined: Jul 27, 2010
Posts: 10363
Location: Now at the Duggo Ranch

0 šŸ‘ / 0 šŸ‘Ž


The Trans Am Mustangs of 69/70 ran narrow rear springs. Inner wheel arch was relocated to the frame rail so they could get the tyres under the rear.

Nice to see them available


Kerry

It is easier to get older than it it is to get wiser

View user's profile
ozbilt
Site Admin

Offline
Joined: Jul 27, 2010
Posts: 10363
Location: Now at the Duggo Ranch

0 šŸ‘ / 0 šŸ‘Ž


BTW, great family history there. I always loved his dad's cars


Kerry

It is easier to get older than it it is to get wiser

View user's profile
Dwayne
Senior Mustang

Offline
Joined: Jun 01, 2016
Posts: 230
Location: Radelaide

0 šŸ‘ / 0 šŸ‘Ž


Thanks Kerry

I went with the goodmark 2" wider inner wheelhouses as my old ones were badly pitted. It's 13" from wheelhouse to guard lip (before any pumping or rolling) at the top centre.

265's will fit easily with stock width springs and give me plenty of room under there.

Didn't notch the frame and I've still got 1.5" room at the rear if i ever wanted to relocate the springs or fit a 4 link. Notching would have given me about 4 inches back there but require engineering.


View user's profile
ozbilt
Site Admin

Offline
Joined: Jul 27, 2010
Posts: 10363
Location: Now at the Duggo Ranch

0 šŸ‘ / 0 šŸ‘Ž


I have only ever carried out the mod the TA way. Move a stock inner to the rail (at the front) and then made the outer as a hoop before making the TA bubble in the rear arch.

Pics are in my photobucket page under 68 AIX Mustang. It has a TCP rear end so the spring side of the discussion is irrelevant. Car ran 12" rears and 11" fronts.


Kerry

It is easier to get older than it it is to get wiser

View user's profile
All times are Australia/Sydney


Jump to:

TopPostersToday
   unilec5544 
 Posts: 
 2 

   66STNG 
 Posts: 
 2 

   Nuts 
 Posts: 
 2 

   nassi 
 Posts: 
 1 

LatestForumPosts
Last 10 Forum Messages

Nuts Clearance Radiator, T5 Sold, Rack Sold
Last post by Nuts in Mustang Parts for Sale on Jan 19, 2018 12:43:29

66 roof bows
Last post by Nuts in General Tech Advice on Jan 19, 2018 08:48:40

Merts deceased estate sale
Last post by unilec5544 in Pre 1973 on Jan 18, 2018 20:29:41

Years in the making....
Last post by ACTstanglover in Mustang Projects on Jan 17, 2018 23:18:27

Dan Gurney passes away
Last post by ozbilt in Events on Jan 17, 2018 10:40:17

67 FG Resto Mod
Last post by Roger in Mustang Projects on Jan 17, 2018 06:54:24

Husky's 65 Restomod
Last post by Husky65 in Mustang Projects on Jan 16, 2018 19:19:52

Canberra
Last post by Ausjacko in Events on Jan 16, 2018 17:32:16

Jacko's Project
Last post by Ausjacko in Other Projects on Jan 14, 2018 19:58:14

New Heart for Scarlet
Last post by soc123_au in Mustang Projects on Jan 12, 2018 22:29:21

SocialMedia

Like this page? Google +1 it!